SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 67541

KUTTAN PILLAI SIVARAJA PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
NARAYANA PILLAI KUMARASWAMI PILLAI(DECEASED) – Respondent


Advocates:
['SRI S V BALAKRISHNA IYER SR', '', 'SRI P B KRISHNAN', 'SRI S D ASOKAN']

The defendants came up against the concurrent

finding rendered by both the Trial Court (Munsiff

Court, Nedumangad) in O.S.No.263/1978 and the First

Appellate Court (Sub Court, Nedumangad) in

A.S.No.66/1996, by granting a decree of recovery of

possession and fixation of boundary in favour of

the plaintiffs.

2. The litigation was started in the year

1978. Forty one years already elapsed after the

institution of the suit. It is a suit for

declaration of title, recovery of possession and

fixation of boundary. It is the 3rd round of

litigation in the same proceedings as the party had

suffered two remand on earlier two occasions. Three

Commissions were respectively let out. It was

accepted one after another by the Trial Court, but

the First Appellate Court reversed the same and

remanded the matter to the Trial Court. It has

resulted in the issuance of 3rd survey Commission,

who in turn prepared survey sketch, report and

SA.No.934 of 2000 5

mahazer. It was accepted by the Trial Court and

the First Appellate Court and decreed the suit,

against which the defendants came up with this

appeal.

3.

The following questio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top