HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SREE VIDYAJAYALAKSHMI KURIES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR OF CHITTIES Advocate -GOVERNMENT PLEADER, SRI K V SOHAN, STATE ATTORNEY SRI K V SOHAN, STATE ATTORNEY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[ W.P.(C)Nos.2613, 3881, 5403, 8363, 8967, 9979, 11487, 11501, 12254, 13587, 14100, 21568, 21911 & 21989 of 2014 & 16091 of 2015]
The captioned writ petitions are materially connected challenging the constitutional validity of the notification issued by the State Government dated 18.12.2013, amending the Kerala Chit Fund Rules, 2012, by substituting Appendix-II, and thereby increasing the Table of Fees. Therefore, I heard them together and propose to deliver this common judgment. Facts and figures contained in W.P.(C) No.2613 of 2014 are relied upon for disposal of the writ petitions, wherein the impugned notification is marked as Ext.P3(a).
2. Petitioners are companies registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, engaged in Chitty business as per the Chit Funds Act, 1982 (in short, 'the Act, 1982'). Pursuant to powers conferred under Sec.89 of Act, 1982, the Government of Kerala, in consultation with the Reserve Bank of India formulated Ext.P1 Kerala Chit Fund Rules, 2012 (in short,'the Rules, 2012'), as per Government notification dated 04.06.2012. The 1st respondent is the registering authority of the 1st petitioner under the Central Act and the 2nd respondent is the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.