SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 29931

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C K MOIDU – Appellant
Versus
PALLIKKAL BAZAR JUMA MASJID MAHALLU COMMITTEE – Respondent


The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to set aside

Ext.P1 notice and also to direct the first respondent to consider

Ext.P2 objection submitted by the petitioner against the direction to

remove the alleged illegal construction.

2.

The petitioner states that Ext.P1 notice was given by the

Secretary of the Panchayat to the petitioner directing the petitioner to

remove the illegal construction activities made by the petitioner. It is

the case of the petitioner that the petitioner has not made any illegal

construction and has acted only within the frame work of law.

3.

When this writ petition came up for admission, this Court

passed an interim order on 10.4.2015 suspending Ext.P1 as an

interim measure. This Court directed the petitioner that the petitioner

shall not indulge in any fresh construction.

4.

The petitioner states that the petitioner has filed Ext.P2

objection against Ext.P1 notice and any further proceedings pursuant

to Ext.P1 without considering Ext.P2 objection of the petitioner will

3

cause irreparable injury to the petitioner.

5.

I

have heard learned counsel for the petitioner as also

the learned counsel for the Panchayat.

6.

In the facts and circumstances of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top