SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39932

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J
P S JIBIN – Appellant
Versus
PANGU    Advocate -SRI M G KARTHIKEYAN – Respondent


JUDGMENT

In view of the commonness of the issues involved in these writ petitions they are taken up for joint hearing and disposal. The petitioners in all these writ petitions are successful bidders in the auction sale of privilege for vending toddy in different toddy shops in different Excise Ranges under different Excise Divisions. The respective 4th respondent in all these writ petitions are the previous licensees of the shops concerned in each of these writ petitions. However, they were denied preference owing to the registration of abkari cases against them other than under section 56 of the Abkari Act. In W.P(C).No.13758/2014, C.R.No.72/2013 of Wadakkancherry Excise Range was registered against the 4th respondent therein under section 55(a)&(i) of the Abkari Act. In W.P(C) No.13868/2014 against the 4th respondent therein C.R.Nos. 14/2013 and 23/13 of Kunnamangalam Excise Range were registered under section 57(a) & 56(b) of the Akbari Act and Rule 9(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules, 2002 and in W.P (C)No.14191/2014 against the 4th respondent therein Crime No.472/2013 of Pulimkunnu police station was registered under section 56(b) & 55(a) & (i) of the Abkari Act. By

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top