J U D G M E N T

The petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:

"i. Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the 2nd respondent to consider Ext.P4 with notice to the petitioner and in view of Ext.P3 Data Bank entry and pass orders thereon within such time as may be fixed by this Hon'ble Court.

ii) issue such other orders, writs or directions as are deemed fit by this Hon'ble Court.

iii) award cost of this proceedings to the petitioner.”

2. The case of the petitioner is that she is the co-owner of the properties having an extent of 20 Ares and 43 Sq. Metres comprised in various survey numbers of Eranellur Village; that it is a 'garden land' which was reclaimed years back with large number of usufructs aged about 30 to 40 years and that it is neither a 'paddy land' nor a 'wet land' under the Act 28 of 2008. In Ext.P3 Data Bank Register, though the nature of the property is described as 'reclaimed land', in the revenue records, it is still described as ' paddy land'. In the said circumstance, the petitioner has preferred Ext.P4 representation before the second respondent to change the entry in the revenue records including the Basic Tax Register.

3. Heard the