2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 56240
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 02ND DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2019 / 11TH BHADRA,
1941
Bail Appl..No.6334 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN CMP 6008/2019 OF JUDICIAL
MAGISTRATE OF FIRST CLASS ,NILAMBUR
CRIME NO.220/2019 OF Nilambur Police Station , Malappuram
PETITIONER/S:
JAHEERUL ISLAM, AGED 33 YEARS
S/O. SAMSUL ISLAM, KATHWAGRAM,
BARDHAMAN DISTRICT, WEST BENGAL.
BY ADVS.
SRI.GEORGE MATHEW
SHRI.PRAVEEN S.
SHRI.SUNIL KUMAR A.G
SHRI.MATHEW K.T.
SHRI.GEORGE K.V.
RESPONDENT/S:
1
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KEALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
2
THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER,
NILAMBUR POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT-
679331, THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
OTHER PRESENT:
SMT.PRIYA SHANAVAS, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION
ON 02.09.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE
FOLLOWING:
::2::
Bail Appl..No.6334 OF 2019
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
-----------------------------
B.A.No.6334 Of 2019
---------------------------------
Dated this the 2nd day of September, 2019.
['GEORGE MATHEW', '', 'SHRI PRAVEEN S', 'SHRI SUNIL KUMAR A G', 'SHRI MATHEW K T', 'SHRI GEORGE K V']
The petitioner has been arrayed as the sole accused in the
instant crime No.220/2019 of Nilambur Police Station. The subject
crime involved in this regular bail application is crime
No.220/2019 of Nilambur Police Station. Initially, the offence
alleged in the instant crime is the one as per Section 307 of the IPC
(attempt to commit murder). The prosecution case is that on
5.6.2019 about 4 p.m., after wordy altercations between the
petitioner/accused and his wife which happened in their house, the
petitioner had poured diesel over the body of his wife and set her
ablaze in his rented quarters at Mukkatta, Nilambur. The
petitioner’s wife was immediately admitted to the hospital and she
has given the FIS before the Police and her FIS was recorded by the
Police in the Hospital whereby she has clearly stated that the
petitioner/accused had poured diesel over her body and set her on
fire on 5.6.2019 at about 4 p.m. It is stated that the petitioner was
asked by his wife to purchase provisions for the day and he had
::3::
gone outside for purchase of provisions and when he came late, his
wife had question as to why he came so late and the petitioner on
being enraged at his wife questioning him, had poured diesel which
has kept in the house, over her body and set fire. Accordingly, on
the basis of he said information conveyed by the victim that the
instant crime No.22/2019 of Nilambur Police Station has been
registered on 5.6.2019 at 7.20 p.m., wherein the offence alleged
therein is one as per Section 307 of the IPC. Initially, the
petitioner’s wife was admitted in Government District Hospital,
Nilambur whereby the FIS was taken and later she was shifted and
admitted to the Government Medical College, Kozhikode on the
next day (6.6.2019). The petitioner was arrested on 6.6.2019 in
connection with the involvement in the above said crime and he
was remanded to the judicial custody by the orders of the Judicial
Magistrate Court concerned. Despite the best treatment given to
the lady, she died on 13.06.2019 at Government Medical College
Hospital, Kozhikode. Thereupon, the Police has altered the offence
in the instant crime as the one as per Section 302 of the IPC.
Sri.George Mathew, the learned counsel appearing for the
petitioner/accused would strongly urge that even going by the
::4::
admitted prosecution allegations, it can be seen that the vital
ingredients to constitute the offence of Section 302 IPC are absent
in this case. Further that no such incident as alleged in the FIS has
taken place and that on an earlier occasion also, the deceased had
attempted to commit suicide. This was informed to her relatives
also. That a male child aged 1½ years has been born to the couple
in their wedlock and that there is none to take care of him. Further
that, the petitioner has been under judicial custody since 6.6.2019
and therefore his continued detention is no longer necessary. In
the light of these aspects, it is urged by the petitioner’s counsel that
the petitioner may be ordered to release on regular bail subject to
stringent conditions. Sri.Geroge Mathew, learned counsel for the
petitioner would urge that now there is none to look after the only
child of the petitioner born in his wedlock with the deceased wife
and the child is aged 1 ½ years, etc.
2.
Per contra, the learned Prosecutor would point out that
immediately after the incident, the Police authorities had taken
steps to inform the Child Welfare Committee and thereafter, the
child is under the custodial care and protection of the Child
Welfare Committee, Malappuram. Further the learned counsel for
::5::
the petitioner would point out that none of the allegations would
disclose the offence as per Sec.302 of the I.P.C in this case and that
at any rate, continued detention of the petitioner is not necessary.
Those aspects have already been dealt with by this Court in Anx-A2
order rendered by this Court on 25.7.2019 in the previous bail
application, B.A.No.5289/2