HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K.SURENDRA MOHAN, J
M K MOHAMMED – Appellant
Versus
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MALAPPURAM – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 17169/2013
Parking - Unauthorised Vehicle Parking - Various Local Acts and Traffic Regulations - The court emphasized the need for local authorities to enforce traffic regulations to prevent obstruction and maintain public accessibility.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner, owner of a commercial building, complained about unauthorized parking of goods vehicles obstructing shop access. Despite representations to the panchayat, no action was taken against the vehicles causing traffic issues.
Finding of the Court:
The court acknowledged the obstruction caused by unauthorized parking, confirming the validity of the petitioner’s complaints. It recognized the need for local authorities to enforce traffic laws to prevent inconvenience to shop tenants and the public.
Issues: Whether the local authorities have a duty to prevent unauthorized parking in a manner that obstructs access to commercial establishments.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that local authorities must take proactive measures to prevent violations of parking regulations that hinder public access and service delivery.
Final Decision: Court directed local authorities to take effective steps against unauthorized parking in front of the petitioner's building.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner, owner of a building situate in R.S.No.303/18 of Pulikkal Village complains of parking of vehicles in front of the building, obstructing the entry into the shop rooms. According to the petitioner, vehicles like goods aurorickshaws and other goods carriers are parked on the road margin, effectively preventing the entry of customers who frequent the shops that are located on the ground floor of the building. Though, the petitioner has submitted a number of representations to the respondents, it is complained that no action has been taken thereon, till date. 2. A counter affidavit has been filed by the Secretary of the Panchayat. It is stated in paragraph 4 of the counter affidavit as follows:
“It is true that the petitioner is the owner of the Building No.VII/23C, D, F situated in Pulikkal Bazar in R.S.No.303/18 of Pulikkal Village. It is also true that the petitioner has leased out the said building to tenants. There is no bus stop in front of the building owned by the petitioner.
WPC.No.17169/13 -2-
However, it is quite true that goods carriers like goods autorickshaws and pick up vans are being parked in front of the building of the petitioner. It is also quite true that it is causing traffic block and inconvenience for the vehicular traffic. The Pulikkal Grama Panchayat also owns a fish market just adjacent to the shop room of the petitioner. This respondent had passed a Resolution in its Board meting held on 17.9.2013 as Resolution No.III(3), whereby, they had decided to approach the police for taking appropriate action. A true copy of the said resolution is produced herewith as Exhibit R4(a). The owners/drivers of the goods carriages are refusing to shift to any other place and are using portion of National Highway as their parking place. ”
3. A statement has been filed by the 2nd respondent.
According to the statement, the Police have taken necessary action against unauthorised parking of vehicles. The drivers of vehicles who frequent the area as well as the Union leaders of motor drivers were instructed not to park their vehicles in violation of the law. According to the statement, the Panchayat authorities have also been addressed to identify a suitable place for parking such goods WPC.No.17169/13 -3-
vehicles.
4. Heard.
5. It is clear from the stand taken by the respondents that the petitioner who is the owner of the commercial building within the limits of the 4th respondent-Panchayat is put to trouble by the unauthorised parking of goods vehicles, autorickshaws and other medium goods vehicles. It is also not in dispute that the entry to the shop rooms in the petitioner's building is obstructed causing nuisance to the customers as well as the pedestrians using the public road. It is also not in dispute that the action complained of is against the law.
6. The above being the position, it is only appropriate that the authorities take effective steps to prevent such violation of law, to ensure that inconvenience and nuisance is not caused to the tenants of the petitioner occupying the shop rooms, their customers as well as the pedestrian public. The organised drivers of such goods vehicles cannot be permitted to violate the law with impunity, while the law enforcement authorities simply look on and watch such violations.
This Writ Petition is therefore disposed of directing WPC.No.17169/13 -4-
respondents 1 and 2 to take effective steps to ensure that no parking of goods vehicles as seen in Exhibit P4 photographs is allowed in front of the petitioner's shop room and on the road margin. The 4th respondent shall also take effective action to see that such unauthorised parking is prevented.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.