HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DR MRS RACHEL ZACHARIAH ALIAS RAHEL – Appellant
Versus
DR M P KORAH Advocate - S SHYAM, ,V K BALACHANDRAN,KIRAN PETER KURIAKOSE – Respondent
An order directing payment of court fee towards
the claim for mesne profits in a suit for partition,
is under challenge by the plaintiff.
2. The claim for partition is laid on the
allegation that the properties sought to be
partitioned are co-ownership properties. The court
below held that, when the plaintiff has assessed the
quantum of mesne profit, the court fee as prescribed
under Section 44 of the Kerala Court Fees and Suits
valuation Act is to be paid.
3. The court fee payable in a suit for partition
is governed by Section 37 of the Court Fees and Suit
Valuation Act. A claim for partition pre-supposes
joint ownership of the property. A co-owner not in
possession seeks for division and separate allotment
of his share which was till then held jointly. He is
a co-sharer along with the others. He is entitled to
his share of the assets. Necessarily the income from
the properties are also liable to be partitioned in
the same proportion.
4. The right of a co-owner to claim for share of
the profits is inherent in his right of ownership
over the property. The income from the property gets
added to the corpus and is thus liable to be
partitioned. This Court has taken the said v
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.