SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2007 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1212

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PIUS C.KURIAKOSE, J
HOLY FAITH BUILDERS AND – Appellant
Versus
CORPORATION OF KOCHI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The issue that arises for consideration in this case is as to how FAR (floor area ratio) is to be worked out, whether on the basis of the Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1999 or on the basis of the structure plan notified in 1991 referring to the Kerala Municipality Building Rules, 1984.

2. Petitioners 1 and 2 are builders belonging to the areas of Tripunithura Municipality and the Corporation of Cochin. The 3rd petitioner is an Association of Builders and is espousing the common grievance of its members who are builders. The petitioners submit that on 20.3.1991, Structure Plan was notified by the Government covering the areas of the Corporation of Cochin, Tripunithura Municipality, Kalamassery Municipality (the then Kalamassery Panchayat) and 9 other Panchayats, viz., Eroor, Thrikkakara, Maradu, Mulavukadu, Narakkal, Elamkunnapuzha, Cheranallor, Thiruvamkulam and Kadamakkuty. The salient features of this Structure Plan (hereinafter referred to as Structure Plan) were that it was for a period of 10 years; the maximum FAR specified thereby was 1.5 which at that point of time was the maximum as per the then existing Building Rules of 1984.

Referring to the opening p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top