SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 34965

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. K. Jayasankaran Nambiar, J
BABY EMMANUEL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 20008/2012



The court upheld the University’s actions to create promotional avenues for Roneo Operators while maintaining that they are not entitled to promotions.

Headnote:

Service Conditions - Roneo Operators - Mahatma Gandhi University Act - Sections 99(2) - Clarifies the applicability of Kerala University Ordinances to Roneo Operators and highlights discriminatory service conditions faced by them.

Fact of the Case:

The writ petitions addressed service conditions of Roneo Operators at Mahatma Gandhi University, focusing on discrepancies in promotional avenues and parity with Clerical Assistants. Petitioners argued for recognition in promotions despite lack of degree qualifications.

Finding of the Court:

The court noted the steps taken by the University to redress issues faced by Roneo Operators, including providing promotional avenues, but concluded that sufficient measures had already been established, dismissing claims for further declarative relief.

Issues: Whether the Mahatma Gandhi University adequately addressed the service conditions and promotional prospects of Roneo Operators in light of existing ordinances and the principles of equity.

Ratio Decidendi: The court determined that the steps taken by the University to accommodate Roneo Operators, including creating promotional posts and addressing qualification disparities, were adequate, upholding the proper exercise of university policy.

Final Decision: All writ petitions dismissed without costs.

J U D G M E N T

As common issues arise in these writ petitions, they are taken up together for consideration and disposed by this common judgment.

2. The primary issue that arises for consideration in these writ petitions is with regard to the service conditions of Roneo Operators working under the Mahatma Gandhi University. An incidental issue that arises is whether, on account of the steps taken by the Mahatma Gandhi University for providing promotional avenues to Roneo Operators, the promotional prospects of clerical assistants working under the University are in any way affected.

W.P.(C).No.20008 of 2012 & W.P.(C).No.20550 of 2012:

The petitioners in these writ petitions were appointed as Roneo Operators in the Mahatma Gandhi University. The post of Roneo Operators was initially created by the University as per order dated 25.02.1988. Thereafter, by subsequent orders the number of posts was increased and currently the strength of Roneo Operators in the University is stated to be 11. As the Mahatma Gandhi University has not framed any Statute or Ordinance of its own in terms of the Mahatma Gandhi University Act, the Statutes/Ordinances made under the Kerala University Act, and which were in force as on 02.10.1983, were made applicable to the Mahatma Gandhi University Act, until such time as they were replaced by the Statutes/Ordinances be made by the Mahatma Gandhi University. This situation came into being by virtue of Section 99 (2) of the Mahatma Gandhi University Act. As per the Kerala University 1st Ordinances, 1978, there is no post of Roneo Operator in the schedule to the said Ordinance. The equivalent post in the said schedule is the post of Duplicator Operator, the method of recruitment to which is shown as direct recruitment or by promotion from those in service. The post of Clerical Assistant is one that is mentioned in the schedule and the method of recruitment is by competitive test and/or interview or by promotion from the cadre of last grade servants. While the minimum qualifications stipulated for a Duplicator Operator is only an ability to read and write, the minimum qualification for the post of Clerical Assistant is a pass in SSLC examination which can be relaxed in the case of those in service. It would appear that the Roneo Operators working under the Mahatma Gandhi University had taken up the matter for parity in treatment with Duplicator Operators under the Kerala University but no steps were taken by the Mahatma Gandhi University to redress the grievance of the Roneo Operators. The Roneo Operators thereafter preferred a representation before the University seeking the inclusion of the post of Roneo Operators in the feeder category to the post of Clerical Assistant, or in the alternative, to treat them at par with Clerical Assistants and extend them further promotions as Assistants, Selection Grade Assistants etc., based on the qualifications possessed by them. The grievance of the petitioners was redressed to a limited extent by the Mahatma Gandhi University by enhancing the pay scale of Roneo Operators so as to make it at par with that of Duplicator Operator in the Kerala University. As their grievances were not fully redressed, and they were not recognised in the regular line of promotions to any higher posts, the petitioners approached this Court through W.P.(C).No.1318 of 2009 which was disposed by Ext.P16 judgment dated 01.04.2011, wherein this Court directed the respondent University to consider taking measures for rectifying the anomaly that existed in the case of Roneo Operators. It was also suggested that the Roneo Operators be included in the feeder category to the post of Assistant Grade -II so as to rectify the said anomaly. The operative portion of the said judgment reads as follows:

“4. It is not disputed before me that the Mahatma Gandhi University has not yet framed their own First Ordinances and they are still following the Kerala University First Ordinances, in respect of qualification

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top