SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 48476

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
BABU – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The petitioner claims certain item of property on the basis of a will executed by the predecessor in interest. The petitioner has approached the revenue authorities for transfer of mutation and after conducting an enquiry the mutation was effected in the name of the petitioner. Subsequently an appeal came to be filed before the Revenue Divisional Officer who had set aside the mutation by way of Ext.P4. The petitioner preferred a revision before the District Collector which is pending consideration. In the meantime the petitioner apprehended that the objectors who claim to be the heirs of the land owner has approached the revenue authorities for effecting mutation in their name. The petitioner who claims right under the will, filed a declaration as envisaged under Rule 27(i) of the Transfer of Registry Rules indicating that a civil suit for probate of will is pending in which the other parties are also made defendants. But the apprehension expressed by the petitioner is that despite the information given to the revenue authorities they are proceeding to effect mutation in the name of other claimants.

2. Having regard to the aforesaid circumstances, since the matter is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top