HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J
BABU – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ERNAKULAM – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 16618/2014
Property - Mutation - Transfer of Registry Rules - Rule 27(i) - The court directed that all mutation proceedings be held in abeyance pending the District Collector's decision, considering the pending civil suit regarding the will, as per Rule 27(i).
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner claims property rights based on a will and had successfully mutated the property in their name. An appeal against the mutation led to its revocation by a Revenue Divisional Officer, while a revision is pending before the District Collector.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that pending the outcome of the revision and civil suit regarding the will, it was prudent to halt all mutation proceedings concerning the property in question.
Issues: Whether to suspend mutation proceedings while the appeal and civil suit regarding the will are pending.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that ongoing litigation concerning the title of property necessitates a stay of mutation proceedings to avoid conflicting claims.
Final Decision: All mutation proceedings are to remain in abeyance until the District Collector's deliberation.
J U D G M E N T
The petitioner claims certain item of property on the basis of a will executed by the predecessor in interest. The petitioner has approached the revenue authorities for transfer of mutation and after conducting an enquiry the mutation was effected in the name of the petitioner. Subsequently an appeal came to be filed before the Revenue Divisional Officer who had set aside the mutation by way of Ext.P4. The petitioner preferred a revision before the District Collector which is pending consideration. In the meantime the petitioner apprehended that the objectors who claim to be the heirs of the land owner has approached the revenue authorities for effecting mutation in their name. The petitioner who claims right under the will, filed a declaration as envisaged under Rule 27(i) of the Transfer of Registry Rules indicating that a civil suit for probate of will is pending in which the other parties are also made defendants. But the apprehension expressed by the petitioner is that despite the information given to the revenue authorities they are proceeding to effect mutation in the name of other claimants.
2. Having regard to the aforesaid circumstances, since the matter is pending before the District Collector, all further proceedings for mutation shall be kept in abeyance until a decision is taken by the District Collector in this regard. The District Collector while considering the revision shall also take into consideration the pendency of the civil suit as envisaged under Rule 27(i) of the Transfer of Registry Rules.
The writ petition is disposed of as above.
A.M.SHAFFIQUE, (Judge)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.