SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2012 Supreme(Online)(KER) 39854

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, J
NALINI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT REGISTRAR (GENERAL)/COLLECTOR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The direction contained in Ext.P4 to pay stamp duty and penalty to the tune of Rs. 2,37,010/- is under challenge in this writ petition. The document in question is a partition deed. The property is having an extent of 15.56 ares in R.S. No.380/12 of Block No.7 of Kakkanadu Village. The petitioner's late husband's father was the owner of the property, who had two children by name Shri Kumaran (husband of the petitioner) and Smt. Kalukurumba. Both of them are no more. The petitioner and her children, viz. Sreeja, Sreela and Sreekesh are the legal heirs of late Shri Kumaran and late Smt. Kalukurumba had one son , viz. Shri Velayudhan. The executants of the partition deed are thus the petitioner and her children through late Shri Kumaran and Shri Velayudhan through late Smt. Kalukurumba. The petitioner contends that in the light of Article 42(i) and its Explanation of the Kerala Stamp Act only Rs.1,000/- is payable as stamp duty. After registering the document, the second respondent impounded it under Section 33 of the Act and referred the document to the first respondent for ascertaining the stamp value. Ext.P2 is the notice inviting objection to which the petitioner gave Ext

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top