JUDGMENT

Since the issue involved in both these writ petitions pertain to the appointment of Reader and Lecturer in the respondent University based on the notification issued on 14/10/2010, they were considered together and disposed of through this common judgment. Reference to parties and exhibits contained hereinafter is in the order as contained in WP(C) No. 31819/2013.

2. The respondent University invited applications for appointment of Reader and Lecturer in different departments, by virtue of Ext.P1 notification, dated 17/06/2010. In Ext.P1, except six posts, all the vacancies were notified as temporary posts. A member of the Senate of the respondent University had challenged Ext.P1 notification in a writ petition filed before this court, WP(C) No.23387/2010. In Ext.P2 interim order passed by W.P.(C)Nos.22394 & 31819 of 2013 2 this court the operation Ext.P1 notification was stayed to the extent it notified the temporary vacancies. This court clarified that, if the University is intending to make temporary appointments based on Ext.P1 notification, such appointment should not be regularised and the appointees should be intimated about the same. It was clarified that the Univers