HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.T.RAVIKUMAR, J
KARTHIKEYAN – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF EXCISE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner who is the registered owner of a Mahindra Jeep with registration No.KL-08 AH 7378 seeks quashment of Exts.P7 and P9 and also a direction to the first respondent to release the said vehicle without any further delay. The said vehicle was seized on 9.10.2010 from Kothamangalam alleging transportation of 456 liters of 'Arishtam' without any valid documents. Consequently C.R.No.39/2010 of Excise Range, Kuttampuzha was registered under Rule 9, 11(a) of the Spirituous Preparation (Control) Rule 1969 and r/w section 56(b) of the Abkari Act. Pursuant to its seizure the vehicle was produced before the authorised officer under section 67 B (1) of the Abkari Act and later it was entrusted to the Excise Inspector for keeping it under the safe custody. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner Ext.P7 order under section 67B of the Abkari Act was passed by the Deputy Commissioner of Excise. The vehicle was confiscated to Government invoking the power under 67B (2) of the Abkari Act. Aggrieved by Ext.P7 order the petitioner preferred Ext.P8 appeal. Later, alleging delay in the matter of its consideration the petitioner approached this Court by filing W.P.(C) No.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.