SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 15847

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J
HAMSA – Appellant
Versus
THE TAHSILDAR – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner is aggrieved by the refusal on the part of respondents 1 and 2 to accept basic land tax from the petitioner in respect of the property covered by Ext.P2 registered partition deed and Ext.P4 purchase certificate even though the property was mutated in the name of the petitioner and inspite of having accepted basic land tax from the petitioner in respect of the property for the period upto 2014- 2015.

2. The prayers in the above Writ Petition (Civil) are as follows :

i) Issue a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents 1 and 2 to collect basic land tax from the petitioner in respect of the property described in Para. 1 of the writ petition and issue him a Possession Certificate.

ii) Issue such other writ, order or direction which are deemed fit and proper on the facts and circumstances of the case and in the interest of justice.”

3. Heard Sri.Jacob Sebatian, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri.Saigi Jacob Palatty, the learned Sr.Government Pleader appearing for the respondents.

4. The petitioner claims to be in ownership and possession of 48.5 cents of dry land in Sy.No.139/16 A1 of Karimbuzha I village in Ottappalam Taluk, Palakkad revenu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top