SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 38113

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
I S INDRA DAS – Appellant
Versus
SRI P P SAIDALAVI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The petitioner while working as Lower Division Clerk at Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Nadapuram stabbed one of his colleagues. The Police registered a crime. The Sessions Court found that the petitioner committed the offences under Sections 353 and 324 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short, IPC). However, invoking Section 84 of IPC, the petitioner was acquitted. That means, the Sessions Court accepted the plea of the petitioner that he was of unsound mind at the time of committing the offence. The Sessions Court, however, ordered release of the petitioner on him executing a bond under Section 335 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The finding of the Sessions Court that the petitioner committed the offences under Sections 353 and 324 IPC was challenged by the petitioner before this Court in Crl.M.C No.174 of 2004. This Court, after noting the purport of Section 84 of IPC, vacated the said finding.

2. The disciplinary authority, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kozhikode, pursuant to disciplinary proceedings, imposed a penalty of reduction of seniority to a lower rank for five years from the date of incident. In the appeal filed before this Court, punishmen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top