SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2015 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40680

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J
V SUDHA – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Alleging that the Chairman of the respondent Municipality in deviance of his earlier stand wanted to shift the sub centre from the ward of the petitioner, the petitioner has approached this Court.

2. The petitioner is a councilor from Punnakkadu of Neyyattinkara Municipality. The Government sanctioned an Ayurveda Sub Centre which has to be started in the place determined by Municipality. Accordingly, the Municipality by Ext.P2 resolution resolved to start the Sub Centre in the building of Cultural Centre in the ward of the petitioner. The District Medical Officer submitted feasibility report to start the sub centre in the ward of the petitioner. The Municipality as well as the Chairman called upon the Government to start the functioning of centre in the ward of the petitioner at the earliest. Thereafter, the Municipal Council without rescinding the WPC No.23742/2014 2 earlier resolution passed a resolution to start sub centre in Mambazhakkara ward. Now, the Chairman in deviance of his earlier stand wanted to shift the sub centre from the ward of the petitioner; it is alleged. It is with this background, the petitioner has come up before this Court.

3. Arguments have been hear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top