HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PILLAI, J
V SUDHA – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL SECRETARY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Alleging that the Chairman of the respondent Municipality in deviance of his earlier stand wanted to shift the sub centre from the ward of the petitioner, the petitioner has approached this Court.
2. The petitioner is a councilor from Punnakkadu of Neyyattinkara Municipality. The Government sanctioned an Ayurveda Sub Centre which has to be started in the place determined by Municipality. Accordingly, the Municipality by Ext.P2 resolution resolved to start the Sub Centre in the building of Cultural Centre in the ward of the petitioner. The District Medical Officer submitted feasibility report to start the sub centre in the ward of the petitioner. The Municipality as well as the Chairman called upon the Government to start the functioning of centre in the ward of the petitioner at the earliest. Thereafter, the Municipal Council without rescinding the WPC No.23742/2014 2 earlier resolution passed a resolution to start sub centre in Mambazhakkara ward. Now, the Chairman in deviance of his earlier stand wanted to shift the sub centre from the ward of the petitioner; it is alleged. It is with this background, the petitioner has come up before this Court.
3. Arguments have been hear
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.