HIGH COURT OF KERALA
STATE OF KREALA – Appellant
Versus
K.V.THOMAS – Respondent
WA 2631/2002
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE THE AG.CHIEF JUSTICE MR.ASHOK BHUSHAN
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE
MONDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/15TH POUSHA, 1936
WA.No. 2631 of 2002 ( )
-----------------------------------
OP 15747/1995 of THIS HONOURABLE COURT
--------------
APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS 1 AND 2 IN THE O. :
---------------------------------------------------------------------
1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE
SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE,
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER
RESPONDENTS/PETITIONERS & RESPONDENTS 3,4,5 & 6 IN THE O.P. :
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. K.V.THOMAS, JUNIOR SUPERINTENDENT,
CITY POLICE OFFICE, KOCHI.
2. P.DIVAKARAN, STORE ACCOUNTANT,
KAP 5TH BATTALIAN, THRISSUR.
DELELTED AS :
*3. K.SAVITHRY, STORE ACCOUNTANT, KAP 4TH
BATTALION, KANNUR.
*DELETED FROM THE PARTY ARRAY AS PER ORDER DT 2/7/2007 IN
IA 561/2007 IN WA 2631/02.
4. K.A.SASI, CASHIER, DISTRICT POLICE
OFFICE, WAYANAD.
5. SUKUMARI, U.D.CLERK, CITY POLICE OFFICE,
TRIVANDRUM.
WA.No. 2631 of 2002 ( )
6. S.KOMALAVALLY, AGED 38 YEARS,
W/O.K.SATHYADEVAN, PULIKKATHU,
VEEDU P.O.PARAKULAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
R1 & R2 BY ADV. SRI.N.SUGATHAN
BY ADV. SRI.K.V.KUMARAN
BY ADV. SRI.A.V.RAMAKRISHNA PANICKER
THIS WRIT APPEAL HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 05-01-2015,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
ASHOK BHUSHAN, Ag.CJ
& A.M.SHAFFIQUE, J.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
W.A.No.2631 of 2002
----------------------------------------
Dated this the 5th day of January 2015
J U D G M E N T
Ashok Bhushan, Ag.CJ
Heard learned counsel for the appellant. This writ
appeal has been filed by the respondents against the
judgment dated 04/01/2002 in O.P.No.15747 of 1995 by
which the original petition was allowed setting aside Ext.P6.
2.
The facts involved in this writ appeal is that the
writ petitioners entered into ministerial service of the Police
Department as Lower Division Clerk and subsequently was
promoted as Upper Division Clerk. Petitioners were
promoted to the cadre of Junior Superintendent and posted
at different places. It is pleaded that, in the case of
ministerial staff in the Police Department, there is no general
transfer on completion of three years and transfers become
necessary only when one is promoted to UDC or Supervisory
cadre. Order dated 11/10/1983 was issued prescribing
W.A.No.2631/2014
2
procedure to be adopted in the case of transfers. General
guidelines/norms for transfer or posting was issued by the
Government on 01/06/1987. Revised guidelines were also
issued thereafter which were modified from time to time.
Government order Ext.P5 dated 03/01/1980 was issued
pertaining to transfer and posting to Government employees
belonging to Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes.
However, the said Government Order was not applicable to
the Police Department. An order dated 27/06/1995 (Ext.P6)
was issued by which Clause 19 was added, which was
subject to challenge in the writ petition. Petitioners' case in
the writ petition is that the Government Order dated
27/06/1985 violated Article 16 of the Constitution of India. It
was pleaded that other employees have also a right to get
posting to the place of their choice and the said right cannot
be confined only to the members of Scheduled Castes and
Scheduled Tribes. It is pleaded that in the matter of transfer
and posting, protection under Article 16(4) cannot be
W.A.No.2631/2014
3
claimed.
3.
The learned Single Judge, by the impugned
judgment, held that Clause 19 inserted by Ext.P6 is
discriminatory and arbitrary. It has further be
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.