J U D G M E N T

K.Harilal, J The petitioners 1 and 3 are sisters and 2nd petitioner is their brother. The 5th respondent is the uncle of the petitioners. The 2nd petitioner is conducting a cable net work unit at Kazhakkuttom and the 1st petitioner is working as the Manager of the unit. The petitioners 1 and 2 and 5th respondent were having some financial transactions between them. Rs.5,00,000/- is due to the 1st petitioner from the 5th respondent and Rs.2,00,000/- is due to the 5th respondent from the 2nd petitioner. The 5th respondent demanded money from the 2nd petitioner. The petitioners took a stand that the same will repaid only if the 5th respondent is clearing the amount due to the 1st petitioner. Thus there arose a dispute in connection with the transaction.

2. The grievance of the petitioners is that the 5th respondent used to come to the house of the petitioners in a Scorpio Van with his henchmen and abused and threatened the petitioners. According to them threat is continuing. On complaint a crime was registered by the police against the 5th respondent alleging the offence under Section 294(b), 341, 323 and 354 IPC. But thereafter no effective action had been taken to avo