2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 21257
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SAJAN SUNNY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Bail Appl. 6539/2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.M.BABU
TUESDAY ,THE 19TH DAY OF MARCH 2019 / 28TH PHALGUNA, 1940
Bail Appl..No. 6539 of 2018
CRIME NO. 1217/2018 OF Thiruvalla Police Station , Pathanamthitta
PETITIONER/S:
SAJAN SUNNY,
AGED 21 YEARS,
KALLUMOOLAYIL HOUSE,
MANJADI P.O,
THIRUVALLA
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.P.PRADEEP
SRI.S.SREEDEV
RESPONDENT/S:
1
STATE OF KERALA,
REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA
2
SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
THIRUVALLA,689621.
3
KELLA APPALA NARASAMMA,
KALLUMOOLAYIL HOUSE, MANJADI.P.O, THIRUVALLA-689105.
SRI C.M. KAMMAPPU, SR.P.P.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 19.03.2019,
THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Bail Appl..No. 6539 of 2018
2
ORDER
1.
Bail is sought. It is sought under Sec.438 of Cr.P.C.
Petitioner is the accused in crime No.1217/2018 of Thiruvalla police
station. He allegedly committed offences punishable under Secs 363
and 376 of IPC, Sec.4 of the PoCSO Act and Secs 10 and 11 of the
Prohibition of Child Marriage Act.
2.
Heard Sri.T.P.Pradeep, the learned counsel for the
petitioner and Sri.C.M.Kammappu, the learned public prosecutor.
3.
The allegations against the petitioner are that he brought
a minor girl from Andhra Pradesh and was residing with her in a
house at Thiruvalla. The petitioner is charged with the offences
under Secs 363 and 376 of IPC, Sec. 4 of the PoCSO Act, and Secs 10
and 11 of the Prohibition of Child Marriage Act. The petitioner
contends that the girl who has resided with him is his wife. He
produced two photographs. It is alleged that what was
photographed were the ceremonies of marriage being performed. It
appears so from the photographs. An affidavit sworn to by the
father of the girl is produced. He has sworn that he gave the girl in
marriage to the petitioner after performing the customary and
religious ceremonies prevailing in his community. It is also stated in
Bail Appl..No. 6539 of 2018
3
the affidavit that it was with the consent of the deponent that the
petitioner and the girl left Andhra Pradesh for Kerala. If the affidavit
is true, it is doubtful whether the offence of kidnapping is attracted.
Sexual intercourse of a man with his wife is rape under Sec.375 of
IPC only if the wife is under 15 years of age. Admittedly the girl was
nearing 18 years when the offences were allegedly committed. The
provisions of the PoCSO Act and the Prohibition of the Child
Marriage Act may be attracted. But custodial interrogation does not
appear to be necessary for an effective investigation of the case. The
learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the girl attained
majority, that her marriage with the petitioner was solemnized
under the Special Marriage Act and that they are residing together
happily. The subsequent development may not be material, but it
does not appear to me that the petitioner would abscond. In the
circumstances, I do not see any reason to deny bail to the petitioner
4.
The application is allowed. If arrested in connection with
crime No.1217/2018 of Thiruvalla police station, the petitioner shall
be released on bail, after interrogation, if any, on his executing a
bond for Rs 40,000/- (forty thousand only) with two solvent sureties
each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer.
The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation. He shall
report to the investigating officer between 10.00 am and 11.00 am
Bail Appl..No. 6539 of 2018
4
on every Saturday for a period of three months or till the filing of the
final report, whichever is earlier. The petitioner shall not intimidate
or try to influence witnesses. Nor shall he destroy or tamper with
evidence. The court having jurisdiction is hereby empowered to
cancel the bail in accordance with law if any of the conditions
mentioned above is violated. If the petitioner surrenders before the