SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 12553

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DR A C VELAYUDHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


When these matters were taken up, Sri.S.Manu, the learned

counsel appearing for the petitioner in these petitions, submitted that

the petitioner has no further grievance as the entire disputes have

been settled between the parties. The said submission is recorded and

these writ petitions are closed.

SD/-

RAJA VIJAYARAGHAVAN V.,

JUDGE

KRJ

//TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25455/2016

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1

TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 8/5/2014

PASSED BY THE THIRD RESPONDENT DISTRICT

COLLECTOR UNDER SECTION 13 OF THE ACT

EXHIBIT P2

TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 16/12/2015

IN WRIT PETITION CIVIL NUMBER 38248/2015 ON

THE FILE OF THIS HONOURABLE COURT

EXHIBIT P3

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED 24/2/2016

PREFERRED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE

THIRD RESPONDENT DISTRICT COLLECTOR

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25471/2016

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE

PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P2

TRUE COPY OF THE FIR REGISTEED BY THRISSU

EAST POLICE STATION

EZHIBIT P3

TRUE COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 29-

06-2016

APPENDIX OF WP(C) 25576/2016

PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:

EXHIBIT P1.

TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT FILED BY THE

PETITIONER

EXHIBIT P2.

TRUE COPY OF THE FIR REGISTERED BY

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top