HIGH COURT OF KERALA
KRISHNANAND R – Appellant
Versus
DIRECTOR – Respondent
WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) 27523/2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.VINOD CHANDRAN
FRIDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2015/3RD ASWINA, 1937
WP(C).No. 27523 of 2015 (M)
----------------------------
PETITIONER:
------------------
KRISHNANAND R., AGED 29 YEARS
S/O.SUDHAMANI, SREEVILASAM HOUSE, SANYASI ODA P.O
IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 552.
BY ADV. SRI.K.V.SABU
RESPONDENTS:
----------------------
1. THE SECRETARY, PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION
PATTOM, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
2. DISTRICT OFFICER
KERALA PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, DISTRICT OFFICE
IDUKKI - 685 552.
3. DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
4. SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF KERALA
SECRETATRIAT, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - 695 001.
BY GOVERNMENT PLEADER SMT. SUNITHA VINOD
BY SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SC, KPSC
THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
25-09-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
WP(C).No. 27523 of 2015 (M)
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:-
-----------------------------------
EXHIBIT P1
-
COPY OF THE RANK LIST PUBLISHED BY THE 2ND
RESPONDENT DATED 01.03.2011.
EXHIBIT P2
-
COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 09.01.2015 ISSUED FROM
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER, GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC
COLLEGE, VANDIPERIYAR.
EXHIBIT P3
-
COPY OF THE LETTER UNDER RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT
BY THE PETITIONER DATED 10.04.2015.
EXHIBIT P4
-
COPY OF THE LETTER DATED 19.05.2015 ISSUED BY PULIC
INFORMATION OFFICER, GOVERNMENT POLYTECHNIC
COLLEGE, NEDUMKANDAM.
EXHIBIT P5
-
COPY OF THE REPRESENTATION DATED 04.08.2015
ADDRESSED TO THE HONOURABLE CHIEF MINISTER OF
KERALA.
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS:- NIL
---------------------------------------
/TRUE COPY//
P.A. TO JUDGE
sp
K. VINOD CHANDRAN, J.
---------------------------------------
W.P(C). No.27523 of 2015
---------------------------------------
Dated this the 25th day of September, 2015.
JUDGMENT
The petitioner seeks for reporting of the vacancies by the 3rd
respondent in the post of Tradesman (Turner). Normally, this
should have been transferred to the Kerala Administrative
Tribunal. But, in the nature of the submission made by the
learned Standing Counsel for the first respondent that the Rank
List itself is no more valid, nothing survives to be considered.
The writ petition would stand closed.
Sd/-
K. VINOD CHANDRAN,
JUDGE
sp
//True Copy//
P.A. to Judge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.