HIGH COURT OF KERALA
RESHMA RAJENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Admit. The learned Public Prosecutor takes notice for the
respondent.
2. The petitioner was issued a passport under directions of this
Court in W.P(C) No.10264 of 2017 vide judgment dated 24.03.2017 at
Annexure-A2. That passport was subsequently renewed vide order
dated 18.09.2018 of the learned Magistrate at Annexure-A3. However,
there was a direction that she shall appear before the Court as and
when required and at any rate she shall surrender her passport on or
before 18.03.2019. Though the validity of the passport was permitted
to be renewed for six months, the Passport Authorities had issued the
passport for one year, and therefore, it was not surrendered on
18.03.2019 inadvertently. Thereafter, the petitioner sought
permission to go abroad and also to renew her passport but vide
impugned order at Annexure-A5 dated 27.09.2019, the learned
Magistrate dismissed her application for the sole reason that she did
not surrender the passport as per Annexure-A3 order on 18.03.2019. It
is now admitted that the petitioner had renewed the passport for one
3
year and before the expiry of that passport she is ready to surrender
it. There were a total of six cases against the petition
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.