2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8145
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
WEDNESDAY,THE 14TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2018 / 23RD KARTHIKA, 1940
Crl.MC.No. 6562 of 2018
CRIME NO. 51/2018 OF Thankamani Police Station , Idukki
PETITIONER:
MANOJ JOSE
AGED 39 YEARS
AZHAKATHU HOUSE, CHEMBAKAPPARA PO, ERATTAYAR VILLAGE,
IDUKKI DISTRICT
BY ADVS.
SRI.GEORGE SEBASTIAN
SRI.ARUN LUCKOSE ABRAHAM
RESPONDENTS:
1
ANIL KUMAR,
S/O DAMODARAN, PUNNAKKAL HOUSE, CHEMBAKAPPARA PO,
ERATTAYAR VILLAGE, UDUMBANCHOLA TALUK PIN 685 514
2
STATE OF KERALA
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF
KERALA, ERNKUALM-682 031
SR PP C S. HRITHWIK.
THIS CRIMINAL MISC. CASE HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
14.11.2018, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2.
The prayer in this Crl. M.C is to quash the
proceedings in Crime No.51 of 2018 of Thankamani
Police Station registered for the offences under
Crl.MC.No. 6562 of 2018 2
Sections 294(b) and 506 IPC and Section 67 of the
Information Technology Act. The case was registered
on the complaint filed by the first respondent that
the petitioner made some postings in a face book
account, which contained obscene matter and
threatening words. The investigating officer sent a
report to the Magistrate stating that the petitioner
is the accused. The proceedings are sought to be
quashed on the ground that the facts of the case do
not attract any of the offences.
3.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4.
I have perused the case diary. In the
complaint filed by the first respondent the
statements which allegedly attract Section 294(b) IPC
or Section 67 of the Information Technology Act do
not find a place. A copy of the postings made on the
face book account are seen in the case diary. They
are only defamatory statements. They are not obscene
words or statement. To attract Section 294(b) IPC
Crl.MC.No. 6562 of 2018 3
the accused must have uttered obscene words. To
attract Section 67 Information Technology Act the
statements should be lascivious or it should appeal
to the prurient interest or if its effect is such as
to tend to deprave and corrupt persons who are
likely, having regard to all relevant circumstances,
to read, see or hear the matter. So neither Section
294(b) IPC, nor Section 67 of the Information
Technology Act is attracted. The offence under
Section 506 IPC is a non cognizable offence. The
proceedings are liable to be quashed.
In the result, this Crl.M.C is allowed. The
proceedings in Crime No.51 of 2018 of Thankamani
Police Station are quashed.
Sd/-
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW
JUDGE
pm
Crl.MC.No. 6562 of 2018 4
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE -A
A TRUE COPY OF THE FIR IN CRIME
NO.51/2018 OF THE THANKAMANI POLICE
STATION
ANNEXURE-B
A TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT DATED
20.01.2018 SUBMITTED BY THE 1ST
RESPONDENT
ANNEXURE-C
A TRUE COPY OF THE ORDER DATED 29.08.2018
ISSUED BY THE DISTRICT POLICE
CHIEF,IDUKKI
RESPONDENTS' EXHIBITS: NIL
// TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE