MANOJ JOSE – Appellant
Versus
ANIL KUMAR – Respondent
Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
2.
The prayer in this Crl. M.C is to quash the
proceedings in Crime No.51 of 2018 of Thankamani
Police Station registered for the offences under
Crl.MC.No. 6562 of 2018 2
Sections 294(b) and 506 IPC and Section 67 of the
Information Technology Act. The case was registered
on the complaint filed by the first respondent that
the petitioner made some postings in a face book
account, which contained obscene matter and
threatening words. The investigating officer sent a
report to the Magistrate stating that the petitioner
is the accused. The proceedings are sought to be
quashed on the ground that the facts of the case do
not attract any of the offences.
3.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner
and the learned Public Prosecutor.
4.
I have perused the case diary. In the
complaint filed by the first respondent the
statements which allegedly attract Section 294(b) IPC
or Section 67 of the Information Technology Act do
not find a place. A copy of the postings made on the
face book account are seen in the case diary. They
are only defamatory statements. They are not obscene
words or statement. To attra
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.