SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40068

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANTONY DOMINIC, J
MIRSHAD MAHAMOOD – Appellant
Versus
KANNUR UNIVERSITY – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

Petitioner is a final year MBBS student in the Pariyaram Medical College affiliated to the 1st respondent University. By Ext.P4 application, he sought revaluation of the Pathology Papers Part I and II. Complaining of delay and seeking a direction for completing the revaluation at any rate before the commencement of the supplementary examination, the writ petition is filed.

2. A statement has been filed by the standing counsel on behalf of the respondents where Ext.R1(a) regulations governing the revaluation have been produced. It is contended that the University is entitled to have 105 working days time from the date of receipt of the application for completing the revaluation. It is therefore submitted that the application made by the petitioner being dated 19/11/11, the writ petition is premature.

3. Although as at present, the University cannot be accused of having delayed revaluation on the application made by the petitioner, fact remains that in matters such as revaluation, the University should complete the process WPC No.31775/11 :2 :

expeditiously so that there will be no uncertainty in the matter. As far as the provisions of the regulations relied on by the lea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top