SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 67661

MUHAMMED ISMAIL – Appellant
Versus
TALUK SUPPLY OFFICER – Respondent


1. Petitioner has approached this Court with the following prayers:-

“A)Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or

direction thereby direct the 1st respondent to issue new ration card to

the petitioner after deleting his name from Exhibit P2 or delete the

names of the other members in Exhibit P2 and issue a new ration

card to the other members in Exhibit P2.

B)Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or

direction thereby direct the respondents to take effective and speedy

steps to issue ration card to the petitioner by considering Exhibit P3

application.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned

Government Pleader.

3. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that Exhibit

P3 application has been submitted seeking issuance of fresh ration

card after deleting the petitioner's name from Exhibit P2 card. It is

submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is a

matrimonial dispute between the petitioner and his wife and

petitioner's wife and children are residing separately. It is stated

that since the petitioner's name is also included in the family ration

card, the petitioner, who claims to b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top