SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 33673

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K VINOD CHANDRAN, J
P R SUDARSANAN – Appellant
Versus
THE COMMANDANT HEADQUARTERS 102 BN DISTRICT GOMTI – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

The petitioner is aggrieved with Ext.P2 order. The admitted case of the petitioner is that the petitioner joined the Border Security Force (B.S.F) as a Constable (General Duty) on 06.07.1967 and after 12 ½ years of service, was dismissed from service w.e.f 14.01.1979, for unauthorised absence; he having over stayed his sanctioned leave. The petitioner even in the writ petition contends that he had been mentally disturbed and had been looking for salvation and hence he did not join duty after the sanctioned leave. The petitioner admittedly made an application dated 01.07.1996 addressed to the Inspector General (Pers) of the B.S.F against the dismissal order, which was rejected and communicated on 14.09.1996 addressed to his home address. The petitioner contends that he did not receive that, since he was a wanderer seeking salvation.

2. Long years in the past the petitioner never thought of approaching the respondent authorities either against the dismissal order passed or for compassionate allowance as provided under Rule 41 of Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972. On 02.04.2013, the petitioner filed Ext.P1 representation for compassionate allowances. Ext.P2 or

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top