SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 53402

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAHINA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Judgement Key Points

Key Points: - The court considered releasing petitioners on regular bail subject to stringent conditions due to substantial completion of investigation and 41 days of detention already suffered. (!) (!) (!) - Bail granted with bond for Rs. 40,000 and two solvent sureties for the same sum each, to the satisfaction of the competent court below. (!) (!) (!) - Bail conditions include reporting to the Investigating Officer on specific Saturdays for ten months, cooperation with investigation, no intimidation or tampering with evidence, and prohibition from committing similar offences; violation allows cancellation of bail. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) (!) - If petitioners violate conditions, jurisdictional court can consider cancellation of bail after hearing both sides. (!) (!) - Petitioners’ claim of no adverse antecedents and substantial completion of investigation; prosecution’s note of no adverse antecedents per IO; defense of false allegations. (!) (!) (!) (!) (!)

How to determine whether accused spouses should be released on regular bail subject to stringent conditions?

What is the appropriate bail amount and conditions for the petitioners in CRMC 1547/2019 arising from Crime No. 426/2019?

What are the obligations and consequences if the petitioners violate bail conditions or commit similar offences while on bail?


The petitioners herein who are spouses have been arrayed as accused

Nos.1 & 2 among the two accused in the instant Crime No.426/2019 of

Pantheerankavu Police Station, Kozhikode, registered for offences

punishable under Sec.392 of the IPC, in respect of the First Information

Statement given by the de facto complainant on 15.09.2019 at about

9.40 p.m., in respect of the alleged incidents which happened on

15.09.2019 at about 1 p.m. in the afternoon.

2.

The prosecution case in short is that on 15.09.2019 at about

1p.m., when the de facto complainant and his family members were praying

at a prayer hall in a mall in Kozhikode, the petitioners had snatched a gold

chain weighing 1 sovereign owned by the child of the de facto complainant

and thereby, they have committed the abovesaid offences. The petitioners

have been arrested and remanded in relation to this case on 03.10.2019

and thereafter, they have been under detention since then.

3

3.

According to the prosecution, the investigation has revealed

that the accused persons are spouses and that they are frequently in the

activity of committing theft at prayer hall of malls and that on their

questioning the gold chain

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top