SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 52159

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANGITHA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent


The petitioner purchased certain immovable

properties from St.George Company, as per Exts.P1

and P2. Petitioner approached the Revenue

Authorities to effect transfer of registry. The

request was not acted upon. Accordingly, the

petitioner approached this Court.

2.

In the statement filed by the Tahsildar,

it is stated that as per the Village Officer's

report St.George Company is having a land in

excess of ceiling area, which was reported to the

District Collector, and company seems to have

transferd the land to the petitioner with

intention to defeat the provisions of the Kerala

Land Reforms Act, 1962.

3.

It is to be noted that the land was in

the name of St.George Company. There is no

concluded proceedings directing the company to

..4..

surrender the land purchased by the petitioner.

In such circumstances, there is no reason for

denying the transfer of registry in favour of

petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2. However,

this will be subject to any proceedings initiated

under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, in accordance

with the law. Needful shall be done to effect

the transfer of registry within a period of one

month.

The Writ Petition is dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top