HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANGITHA – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
The petitioner purchased certain immovable
properties from St.George Company, as per Exts.P1
and P2. Petitioner approached the Revenue
Authorities to effect transfer of registry. The
request was not acted upon. Accordingly, the
petitioner approached this Court.
2.
In the statement filed by the Tahsildar,
it is stated that as per the Village Officer's
report St.George Company is having a land in
excess of ceiling area, which was reported to the
District Collector, and company seems to have
transferd the land to the petitioner with
intention to defeat the provisions of the Kerala
Land Reforms Act, 1962.
3.
It is to be noted that the land was in
the name of St.George Company. There is no
concluded proceedings directing the company to
..4..
surrender the land purchased by the petitioner.
In such circumstances, there is no reason for
denying the transfer of registry in favour of
petitioner pursuant to Exts.P1 and P2. However,
this will be subject to any proceedings initiated
under the Kerala Land Reforms Act, in accordance
with the law. Needful shall be done to effect
the transfer of registry within a period of one
month.
The Writ Petition is dis
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.