2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 2412
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALEXANDER THOMAS
MONDAY, THE 18TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2019 / 27TH KARTHIKA, 1941
BAIL APPL.NO.8239 OF 2019
CRIME NO.942/2019 OF VALLIKUNNAM POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA
PETITIONER:
SUNNEESH SIDHEEK, AGED 32 YEARS,
S/O. SIDHEEK @ SUBINA MANZIL, ELIPPAKULAM,
KATTANAM, VALLI KUNNAM, ALAPPUZHA, KERALA.
BY ADVS.
SRI.RASHEED C.NOORANAD,
SMT.M.N.ANITHA
RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
STATE OF KERALA
REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031
SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
18.11.2019, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
-------------------------------------
B.A. No. 8239 of 2019
-------------------------------------
Dated this the 18th day of November, 2019
The petitioner herein has been arrayed as the sole
accused in the instant Crime No.942/2019 of Vallikunnam Police
Station, Alappuzha, which has been registered for offences
punishable under Secs.376(2)(n), 420 & 506 of the IPC, on the
basis of the FIS given by the lady defacto complainant on
21.9.2019 at about 2.25 pm, in respect of the alleged incidents
which have happened for the period from 1.7.2019 to 31.7.2019.
2.
The brief of the prosecution case is that, the petitioner
aged 32 years is an unmarried man who was earlier working in a
gulf country, and the lady defacto complainant is a married
woman aged 30 years who is having a minor son and whose
husband is working in the Indian Army in Assam. The
petitioner/accused and the lady defacto complainant had
developed friendship through social media like Facebook and that
it turned out to be a love affair and the petitioner persuaded the
lady to set up her cousin sister one “Bhagya” to develop intimate
relationship with the lady defacto complainant's husband through
B.A. No. 8239 /2019
..3..
telephonic contact etc, so that her husband would develop interest
in other woman and so that she could continue her affair with the
petitioner. Thereupon, the lady had persuaded her cousin “Bhagya”
to develop such intimate relationship through frequent telephonic
calls with her husband. Thereafter, the petitioner accused and the
lady defacto complainant continued their amorous and illicit
relationship. Further, she would state in her FIS that she starts
developing a deep love for the petitioner. That, some time in July,
2019, she went with the petitioner for a tour to Mysore. Later on a
day when none was there in her house, the petitioner accused had
came to the lady's house and both of them posed for selfie
photographs in nude posture. The said nude photograph was taken
in the mobile cell of the lady and later the petitioner had
transferred the said nude photographs to his mobile, and he
started threatening her for further sexual favours and money, and
even started assaulting her. Later she came to know that the
petitioner is a person who plays fraud in such cases and thereafter
the petitioner compelled her to elope with him and should bring
him dowry money and gold ornaments along with her. Later the
lady settled the issues with her husband. At that time the petitioner
B.A. No. 8239 /2019
..4..
consistently threatened her that he would disclose the intimate
photographs and other incidents to her husband, and made her
part with Rs.50,000/- which he had not so far returned back.
Further , the petitioner again threatened her that he would divulge
the said nude photographs to her husband and she had no other
alternative, but to make the abovesaid complaint by way of FIS
before the Police, which has led to the registration of the instant
crime. The petitioner has been arrested in this case on 22.9.2019
and after his remand, has been under detention since then.
3.
Both sides would now submit that the investigation has
been completed and the final report/charge sheet has been filed
before the competent criminal court on 20.10.2019.
4.
The counsel for the petitioner would point out that a
close and intelligent reading of the FIS would make it clear like the
day light that if the alleged incidents narrated therein are broadly
true then the same would have happened only on the basis of
consent between the parties and not otherwise and therefore
the vital ingredients of rape as per Sec.376 of the IPC are not
made out.
5.
The learned Prosecutor would strongly urge that the
B.A. No. 8239 /2019
..5..
investigation has now revealed that even after the lady had settled
issues with her husband the petitioner was consistently
blackmailing and intimidating her that he would divulge the said
incidents and nude photographs to her husband and further that,
he had even forced her to part with Rs.50,000/- on the basis of
said blackmail, and that at one point of time