SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 44573

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. Muhamed Mustaque, J
AJAYAKUMAR N – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

1.The petitioners are registered headload workers engaged in loading and unloading works in and around Anayara Venpalavattom World Agricultural Market. They have approached this Court, seeking the following reliefs;

“i) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 4th respondent to complete the proceedings to implement the Kerala Headload Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Scheme 1983 in the Anayara World Agricultural Market and surrounding Area as expeditiously as possible.

ii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction directing the 4th respondent to consider the representation of the petitioners regarding the implementation of the Scheme in the area wherein construction of LuLu Mall is under progress.

iii) To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction granting such other reliefs as deemed fit and proper by this Hon'ble Court on the facts and circumstances of the case.

iv) To pass appropriate orders granting cost of these proceedings to the petitioner.”

2.When the matter came up for consideration, the learned Standing Counsel for the 4th responde

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top