SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30493

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
RUPESH RAVINDRAN – Appellant
Versus
MANAGING DIRECTOR    Advocate -SRI GEORGE MATHEW, SC, KERALA WATER AUTHORITY – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash retrospective effect of Ext.P1 water tariff with effect from 01.10.2014, and for other related reliefs. Brief facts for the disposal of the writ petition are as follows:

2. Petitioner has a water connection provided by the

2nd respondent for household purposes. Respondents have changed the water tariff, and published Ext.P1 in the website of the 2nd respondent, on 20.01.2016. According to the petitioner, Ext.P1 is given retrospective effect from 1st October, 2014, while it is published only on 20th January, 2016. The 2nd respondent has billed the petitioner in the year 2016 for the water used by the petitioner from 01.10.2014 to 31.12.2015. Similar bills have been issued to all the users of the water supplied by the Kerala Water Authority. This has caused, according to the petitioner, a mass disappointment among the users, as many had to pay the bill amounting to around 10 times, their regular usage. Since the order was passed and apprehending water connection would be disconnected if the bill is not paid, every one paid the bill thinking that the order is passed by the Government, and hence it cannot be challeng

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top