SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 30965

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
SUBRANMANYAN PILLAI – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDITIONAL TAHSILDAR KOTTARAKKARA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the owner of an extent of 2 Acre and 30 cents of rocky land in Kareepra Village. The property comprised in Survey No.122/10-2, according to the petitioner was purchased by the petitioner as per Document No.931/1991 of the Ezhukode, SRO. After purchasing the property, petitioner filed an application before the first respondent to get the land mutated in his name. Accordingly, registry was transferred and petitioner was paying land tax on account of Thandapper No.8372 of Kareepra Village. The second respondent who claimsto be the owner of 70 cents in old Survey No.795/10 as per Documents Nos.241/1994, 245/1995 and 32/1998 filed a complaint alleging that the property for which transfer of registry had been effected in the name of the petitioner forms part of the property owned by the second respondent. Enquiries were conducted and to cut a long story short, orders were passed against the petitioner cancelling the transfer of registry existed in favour of the petitioner. While so, now, as per Ext.P3 notice, measurement of the property is undertaken by the first respondent and the petitioner is directed to be present before the authorities concerned on 18.2.2016.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top