SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2019 Supreme(Online)(KER) 16466

K.P.SHAJI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
['T A SHAJI SR', '', 'SRI S ABHILASH VISHNU', 'SRI ATHUL SHAJI', 'GOVERNMENT PLEADER']

Petitioners 1 to 3 are the joint licensees of Toddy Shop

No.37 of Group No.6 of Vaikom Excise Range in Kottayam

District, for the Abkari year 2018-19; and petitioners 4 to 7

are the joint licensees of Toddy Shop No.38 of Group No.7 of

Vaikom Excise Range in Kottaym District, for the Abkari year

2018-19. The petitioners have filed this writ petition under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of

certiorari to quash Ext.P3 communication dated 10.10.2018 of

the 3rd respondent Circle Inspector of Excise issued to

petitioners 1 to 3; and Ext.P4 communication dated

10.10.2018 of the said respondent issued to petitioners 4 to 7.

In the aforesaid communications, it is stated that the

respective toddy shops are found to be located not within the

prescribed boundaries and accordingly, the respective licensees

are directed to shift the respective toddy shops within the

prescribed boundaries. The petitioners have also sought for a

writ of mandamus commanding the respondents to allow

petitioners 1 to 3 to run toddy shop No.37 of Group No.6 in

Vaikom Excise Range and petitioners 4 to 7 to run the toddy

shop No.38 of Group No.7 in Vaikom E

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top