SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 44239

AAYSHATH NAJILA SCHEMNAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


A.K.Jayasankaran Nambiar, J.

The Petitioner in W.P.(C)35202/18 is the appellant herein, aggrieved by the

judgment dated 29.10.2018 of the learned Single Judge. For the sake of

convenience, reference to the parties and documents is as they appear in the

writ petition.

2. The petitioner had obtained admission to the Government Law College,

Trivandrum pursuant to the online allotment process that was initiated for

admission to the three year LLB Course, 2018 in the Law Colleges within the

State. It is the case of the petitioner that she had indicated her first preference

as the Government Law College, Ernakulam and the second preference as

Government Law College, Trivandrum and in the online allotment process, she

was allotted the Government Law College, Trivandrum based on the vacancy

position that obtained then. Although there was a provision in the prospectus

that enabled candidates to opt for their higher preference in the event of any

vacancy arising in the said college of preference, it is not in dispute that during

the online admission process there was no vacancy that arose at Government

Law College, Ernakulam to accommodate the petitioner. The online adm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top