HIGH COURT OF KERALA
BEEPATHU – Appellant
Versus
RAMANTHALI GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
The petitioner has approached this Court seeking that Ext.P5
building permit granted to respondents 3 and 4 be set aside, since it
violates the provisions of the Kerala Panchayat Raj Act and the Kerala
Panchayat Building Rules (KPB Rules); with an alternative plea that the 2nd
respondent - Secretary of the Grama Panchayat be directed to take
necessary action against the said respondents under Rules 19 and 20 of
KPB Rules and demolish the alleged unauthorised construction forthwith.
2. When this matter was called today, there was no representation
for the petitioner nor was she present in person and the record shows that
this was the situation even when this matter was listed earlier. I am,
therefore, constrained to dispose of the matter in the absence of the
petitioner.
3. Smt.Vaheeda Babu, learned counsel appearing for respondents 3
and 4, submitted that the writ petition is not maintainable since the
challenge to a validly issued Building Permit cannot be entertained by this
Court, while acting under Article 226 of the Constitution of India,
3
particularly because the petitioner has an alternative, efficacious,
statutory remedy of appro
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.