SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 Supreme(Online)(KER) 19683

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
C P AJITH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the 1st respondent to consider Ext.P3 and take immediate steps to erect/place appropriate traffic signs in required areas of ordinary roads/State Highways/National Highways and further to issue charge memos to drivers in case of violation without any delay and for other related reliefs.

2. Brief facts for the disposal of the writ petition are thus; petitioner is a travel operator. He is operating the vehicles through drivers employed by him. On account of the failure on the part of the Motor Vehicle Department in erecting sign boards showing speed restriction in required areas, the drivers are charge sheeted for violation of maximum speed limit about which they are ignorant. So also it is contended that there is inordinate delay in issuing charge memos in case of violations enabling the driver who committed the violation to escape from the penalty. Seeking to ventilate the grievance, petitioner has submitted Ext.P3 representation before the 1st respondent. It is in this backdrop that this writ petition is filed by the petitioner.

3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader.

4. Le

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top