HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAJI P.CHALY, J
ROBY ABRAHAM @JOSEPH – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB REGISTRAR – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
As per Ext.P1 gift deed and Ext.P2 patta, petitioner is the owner in possession of an extent of 5.1636 hectares of land in Sy.No.3/1pt, Block No.155 of Kerala Estate Village. According to the petitioner, evident from Ext.P3 tax receipt, the property is mutated in the name of the petitioner. Petitioner now wants to sell a portion of the above mentioned property. As per rule 3(a)(vi) of Transfer of Registry Rules r/w. Guideline No.1 prescribed in Ext.P4 Government Order, at the time of registration of a transfer deed of one's property, it is incumbent upon such persons to produce the abstract of his Thandaper/RoR, to be issued by the Village Officer, before the Sub Registrar so as to effect the online transfer of registry of his property. The said direction is applicable with respect to such Villages which are notified under the National Land Records Modernisation Programme. Since the village where the property of the petitioner situates also is in a notified village, petitioner submitted Ext.P5 application seeking issuance of RoR, however, according to the petitioner, in spite of the earnest efforts of the petitioner, no action is initiated by the 1st respondent and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.