The petitioner impugnes Ext. P3 and P4 orders issued by the

Maintenance Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal respectively, constituted

under the provisions of the Maintenance And Welfare of Parents And

Senior Citizens Act, 2007 (MWPSC Act for Short), on the ground that it has

been issued without considering the relevant factors and without taking

into account her specific contentions.

2.

I have heard Sri. Jayesh Mohan Kumar, learned counsel

appearing for the petitioner and the learned senior government pleader

appearing for respondents 1 and 2. Even though notice from this court has

been served validly on respondent no. 3, he has chosen not to be present in

person before this court or to be represented through counsel and

therefore, I am inferentially lead to the view that he has nothing to offer in

answer to the various allegations in this writ petition.

3.

I have examined the orders impugned in this writ petition and I

notice that the petitioner's plea for having a particular document, executed

by her in favor of the third respondent, be set aside, has been declined

because the Maintenance Tribunal and the Appellate Tribunal found that

the execution of the said docu