TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER – Appellant
Versus
OMAR FAROOQUE MINTY P.T – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
[WA Nos.2242, 2406, 2411, 2422, 2428, 2429, 2434, 2436, 2448, 2455, 2456, 2457, 2459, 2460, 2469, 2472, 2474, 2479, 2492, 2503, 2514, 2554, 2555/2019 14, 35, 71, 452, 590, 668, 695, 702, 748, 768, 787, 788, 792, 819, 826, 882, 887, 901, 927 & 972/2020]
Dated this the 19th day of November, 2020 Shaffique, J.
These appeals have been filed by the officers of the State challenging judgment of the learned Single Judge disposing of the writ petitions filed by party respondents by issuing the following directions:-
"37. As a result of my above discussion I summarise my judgment on the issues noted above as follows:
(a) Section 3(6) of Motor Vehicles Taxation Act, 1976 is within the competence of State legislature and Section 3(6) is not in any manner repugnant to Chapter IV of Motor Vehicles' Act, 1988 or ultra vires Act 1976. Section
3(6) therefore is valid and legal.
(b) The registration of a non-transport vehicle and payment of registration fee under Act 1988 or payment of motor vehicle tax under a State legislature continues to be valid so long as the vehicle is kept and used in the State in which it is registered. These vehicles if enter State of Kerala and stay beyond the p
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.