SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(KER) 54961

RENGINI SASIDHARAN – Appellant
Versus
THE KERALA STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD – Respondent


Advocates:
PAULY MATHEW MURICKEN, SRI.AMEER.K.M.

JUDGMENT

The petitioner impugns the installation of a transformer which, according to her, is being erected adjacent to her compound in a manner so as to denude the utility and value of his property. She further says that the Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd.(KSEB for short), is attempting to energise the line without obtaining the permission of the Electrical Inspectorate and also that they have illegally installed certain stay wires within her property without her consent.

2. The petitioner says that her parents, therefore, approached the Civil Court earlier but that the suit was dismissed by the said Court accepting the version of the KSEB that the said suit was not maintainable and that the petition therein ought to have invoked their alternative remedies under the Electricity Act 2003 and that she, therefore, preferred

Ext.P7 representation before the Electrical Inspectorate notifying them that the installation of the transformer and the electric lines are in violation of the Central Electricity (Measures ::4:: Relating to Safety and Electric Supply) Regulations 2010; as also Ext.P8 application before the concern

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top