HIGH COURT OF KERALA
SHAMSUDHEEN K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Admit. Government Pleader takes notice for the respondents.
2. The petitioners are retired teachers who were involved in census duty while they were in service. They were granted earned leave during that period. Later, they were asked to refund a portion of the earned leave (24 days) and they repaid the same. The writ petition has been filed seeking refund of the amount that they had repaid with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
3. This Court has in the judgment in W.P.(C) No.34042 of
2023 with respect to similarly situated persons relied on other judgments of this Court and held that the petitioners therein are entitled for the amount which was recovered. The Court directed to refund the amount within four months leaving open the question of payment of interest for delayed payment. I do not find any reason to take a different view. The Government has also issued consequential orders to refund such amounts.
The writ petition is hence allowed. There will be a direction to the respondents to release the amounts recovered from the petitioners within three months from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. The question regarding the liability of the respondents to pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.