HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
Shri Jikham Syrti – Appellant
Versus
State Of Meghalaya – Respondent
Tr.P.(Crl.) 1/2016
1
THE HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA
TR.P.(CRL). No. 1/2016
Shri Jikham Syrti,
Son of Smti Sbait Syrti,
Resident of Jalaphet, Bri-Sumer Village,
East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya
… Petitioner
-Versus-
1.
State of Meghalaya
Represented by the Chief Secretary,
Government of Meghalaya,
Shillong.
2.
Shri. Teibor Pala,
Son of Smti. Violet Pala,
Resident of Sutnga Pohshnong Village,
East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya.
3.
Shri. Shining Langstang,
Son of Smti. Sngew Langstang,
Resident of Sutnga Pohshnong Village,
East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya.
4.
Shri. Ioomonmi Langstang,
Son of Smti Bimas Langstang
Resident of Sutnga Pohskur Village,
East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya.
5.
Shri. Kyrkhu Langstang,
Son of Smti Pala Langstang,
Resident of Sutnga Pohskur Village,
East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya.
6.
Shri Sumarbiang Bareh,
Son of (L) Ke Bareh,
Resident of Sutnga Pohshnong Village,
East Jaintia Hills District, Meghalaya.
….Respondents
2
BEFORE
THE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.SEN
For the petitioner
:
Mr. E.Nongbri, Adv.
For the respondents
:
Mr. N.D.Chullai, Sr. GA.
Ms. S.Bhattacharjee, GA.
Ms. S.Pandit, Adv.
Date of hearing
:
29.06.2016
Date of Judgment
:
29 .06.2016
JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)
Heard Mr. E.Nongbri, learned counsel for the petitioner as
well as Mr. N.D.Chullai, learned Sr. GA, assisted by Ms.
S.Bhattacharjee, GA.
2.
Brief facts of the case in a nutshell is that:
“The factual matrix of the case is that on
22.11.2013 at around 2 Pm, one (Since
deceased and the then Headman of Jalaphet
Village, Bri-Sumer and hereinafter referred to
as the Victim for brevity) and one of his friends
viz. Shri Braceman Gympad were proceeding
from Sutnga side towards Khliehriat in his car
and on reaching Moopala Village, a Gypsy
came from behind dashed and blocked the car
of the Shri Ken Syrti. Subsequently, 5 (five)
unknown persons emerged out of the Gypsy
armed with daos and weapons and attacked
the Victim without any reason whatsoever. As
a result, the Victim was badly injured and was
taken to Woodland Hospital, Shillong for
treatment.
Immediately, the Petitioner being the
nephew of the victim lodged an FIR before
Officer-in_Charge, Khliehriat Police Station and
a case was registered at the Khliehriat Polilce
Station as Khliehriat P.S. Case No. 271 (11)
2013 under Section 307/241/326/34 IPC. But
3
sadly,
on
27.11.2013
Shri
Ken
Syrti
succumbed
to
his
injuries
at
Woodland
Hospital, Shillong.
It
was
on
11.03.2014
that
the
Respondents No. 2 to 6 (Accused Persons) got
arrested and on the prayer made by the I/O
they were then remanded to five (5) days Police
Custody. Pursuant to this the I/O had made a
prayer on 13.03.2014 before the learned Court
of the Additional District Magistrate, Khliehriat
for adding an additional section of 302 IPC in
the said case and the same was allowed.
During the course of investigation; the
Police seized several weapons which include
two (2) numbers of Wooden Stick, one (1) local
Dao with wooden handle rounded with silver
colour coil from the 5 (five) Accused Persons.
After the expiry of five days of police custody
the Respondents were again remanded to 14
days of Judicial Custody vide Order dated
14.03.2014. The Case was then charged
sheeted on the 25.03.2014 and registered as
GR Case No. 305 of 2013. Thereafter, on
01.04.2014,
bail
was
granted
to
the
Respondents No. 2 to 6.
The humble Petitioner feels it is apt to
bring to the attention of this Hon’ble Court of
the fact that even though the Investigation
Officer had sought for five days of Police
Custody for the Respondents No. 2 to 6; yet
surprisingly they were detained only for a
period of 2 (two) days after which they were
ta
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.