SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JAVED AKHTAR AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MEGHALAYA – Respondent


Advocates:
['AS SIDDIQUI', 'SR ADV', '', 'S PANDIT', 'AG MOMIN', 'T YANKI', 'MK SAH', 'S KHONGSHLING', 'D HYNNIEWTA', 'N SINGH', 'C RAPSANG', 'W NAJIAR', 'S SEN', 'SR GA', '', 'B BHATTACHARJEE', 'AAG', 'R COLNEY', 'GA', 'ZE NONGKYNRIH']

1

Serial No. 01

Supplementary List

HIGH COURT OF MEGHALAYA

AT SHILLONG

Crl.Petn. No. 99 of 2021

Date of Decision: 25.02.2022

Shri Javed Akhtar & Anr.

Vs.

State of Meghalaya

Coram:

Hon’ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh, Judge

Appearance:

For the Petitioner/Appellant(s)

:

Mr. A. S. Siddiqui, Sr. Adv. with

Ms. M.K. Sah, Adv.

For the Respondent(s)

:

Mr. B. Bhattacharjee, AAG. with

Ms. Z.E. Nongkynrih, GA.

i)

Whether approved for reporting in

Yes/No

Law journals etc.:

ii)

Whether approved for publication

in press:

Yes/No

1.

Matter is taken up via hybrid mode.

2.

Heard Mr. A.S. Siddiqui, learned Sr. counsel along with Ms. M.K. Sah,

learned counsel for the petitioners who has submitted that this instant

application has been preferred u/s 482 Cr.P.C with a prayer to quash the

proceedings in GR Case No. 278(S) of 2014 pending in the Court of the

learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shillong.

3.

Mr. Siddiqui while narrating the sequence of events has submitted that

the petitioner No. 1 and the petitioner No. 2 herein

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top