SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
Hon'ble Mr Justice MV Muralidaran
MD. NASIMUDDIN – Appellant
Versus
OFFICER IN CHARGE, THOUBAL POLICE STATION – Respondent


Item No. 6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

AB. No.32 of 2022

Md. Nasimuddin

…Petitioner/s

- Versus -

Officer in Charge, Thoubal PS.

…Respondent/s

BEFORE

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MV MURALIDARAN

ORDER

20.07.2022

[1]

Heard Mr. N. Kumarjit, learned senior counsel for the petitioner and

Mr.Lenin Hijam, learned AG who takes for the respondent.

[2]

Mr.N.Kumarjit, learned senior counsel for the petitioner argued the case

that the petitioner apprehending the arrest by the respondent police based on

Registration of the case in the FIR No.33(4) 2021 TBL PS and the summon

issued by the D.C, Chandel District, Manipur dated 20.06.2022 therefore, he

approached this Court and filed this anticipatory bail.

[3]

When this Court posed a questioned to the learned senior counsel for the

petitioner that without approaching the learned Sessions Judge by invoking the

provision of Section 438 Cr.PC and how he directly approached this Court and

filed this application.

[4]

Mr. Kumarjit, learned senior counsel for the petitioner represented that as

per the provision under Section 438 Cr. PC confers concurrent jurisdiction on

ABUJAM

SURJIT

SINGH

Digitally signed

by ABUJAM

SURJIT SINGH

Date:

2022.07.29

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top