SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR
RN. LIVINGJOY AND 20 OTHERS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MANIPUR AND ANOTHER – Respondent


Advocates:
['A ROMMEL', '', 'N IBOTOMBI', 'L MONOMALA', 'GA', '', 'N SAVITRI', 'M BABINA']

Item No. 26

WP(C)No. 647 of 22

Page 1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

W.P.(C) No. 647 of 2022

RN Livingjoy & 20 ors.

Petitioner/s

Vs.

State of Manipur & anr.

…Respondent/s

B E F O R E

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AHANTHEM BIMOL SINGH

31-10-2022

Heard Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel assisted by

Ms. M. Babina, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Mr.

Th. Sukumar, learned GA appearing for the respondents.

[2]

In view of the simple issue involved in the present writ

petition and as agreed by the learned counsel appearing for the

parties, the present writ petition is being disposed of at the admission

stage itself without waiting for the counter affidavit of the respondents.

[3]

The case of the petitioners is that a memorandum of

agreement was executed between the State Government represented

by the Hon’ble Minister, Water Resources, Manipur and the Joint

Action Committee against Forced Construction of Mapithel Dam,

Manipur (JACAFCM) and Mapithel Dam Affected Headman/Chiefs &

Elders Organization (MDAHCEO) on 04-12-2020. In the said

agreement, it is, inter alia, agreed between the said parties that Rs. 1.5

lakh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top