SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

CH.NGOUNIBA and ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MANIPUR – Respondent


W.P.(C)No. 142 of 2005Page 1 of 4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF MANIPUR

AT IMPHAL

W.P.(C)No. 142 of 2005

Ch. Ngouniba, Casual, Road Muhorrir & 20 Ors.

….Petitioners

- Versus –

1.

The State of Manipur represented by the Chief

Secretary to the Government of Manipur.

2.

The

Commissioner

(Works),

Government

of

Manipur.

3.

The Labour Commissioner, Government of Manipur

4.

The Finance Secretary, Government of Manipur.

5.

The Chief Engineer – I, P.W.D., Government of

Manipur.

6.

The Executive Engineer, Senapati Division, P.W.D.

Government of Manipur.

Respondents

BEFORE

HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. RAMALINGAM SUDHAKAR

For the petitioners

:

Mr. Kh. Binoy, Advocate

For the respondents

:

Mr. RK. Umakanta, Govt. Advocate

Mr. N. Ibotombi, Sr. Advocate

Date of hearing & order

:

24.05.2019

W.P.(C)No. 142 of 2005Page 2 of 4

O R D E R

[1]

Heard Mr. Kh. Binoy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners,

Mr. RK. Umakanta, learned G.A. appearing for the respondents No. 1 – 4 and

Mr. N. Ibotombi, learned senior counsel appearing for the respondents No. 5 & 6.

[2]

Prayer in the writ petition reads as follows :

“(i)

To issue a rule nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause

as to why the prayers of t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top