SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

RAM – Appellant
Versus
RAM – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S P PALIT', '', 'M P MOHAPATRA', 'A K PATTNAIK', 'D MOHANTA', 'S K SANGANARIA', 'S PATTNAIK', 'D P DHALSAMANTA', 'M/S P K MISRA', '', 'B SAHOO', 'A K NANDA', 'S K SWAIN', 'R N DASH']

HIGH COURT OF ORISSA : CUTTACK

S.A. No.289 of 1989

In the matter of appeal under Section-100 of the Code of Civil

Procedure assailing the judgment and decree dated 22.04.1989 and

5.5.1989 respectively passed by Additional District Judge, Sambalpur in

Title Appeal No. 37 of 20 of 1984/85.

………

Ram Harek Pasi

::::

Appellant.

-:: VERSUS ::-

Ram Harek Keut

::::

Respondent.

Advocate(s) who appeared in this case by hybrid arrangement

(virtual/physical) mode.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For Appellant

M/s. P. Palit, M.P. Mohapatra, A.K.

Pattnaik, D.Mohanta, S.K.

Sanganaria, S. Pattnaik & D.P.

Dhalsamanta, Advocates

For Respondent

M/s. P.K. Misra, B. Sahoo, A.K.

Nanda, S.K. Sain & R. N. Dash,

Advocates

CORAM :

MR. JUSTICE D. DASH

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Date of Hearing: 17.12.2021 & Date of Judgment: 23 .12.2021

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

D.Dash,J. The Appellant, by filing this

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top