SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

ARVIND KUMAR SAHU – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF ORISSA – Respondent


W.P.(C) No.19538 of 2015

02. 06.11.2015 Heard Mr. A.K. Patra, learned counsel for the petition

er and Mr. B. Bhuyan, learned Additional Government Advocate for the State.

Challenge in the present writ application has been made to the time gr

anted to the petitioner for complying with the conditions imposed by the Superintendent of Exc

ise, Rayagada under cover of his letter dated 23.09.2015 under Annexure-4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the land owner has ini

tiated steps for conversion of the land in question and for executing the necessary lease deed

and registration of the same. Accordingly, representation has been made by him to the Superin

tendent of Excise and getting no response thereof, the writ application has come to be filed.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petiti

oner as well as learned counsel for the State, we direct that the conditions imposed by the Su

perintendent of Excise, Rayagada under Annexure-4 shall be complied with positively by the end

of January, 2016 and till such date, the petitioners operation at

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top