DANDAPANI – Appellant
Versus
TUTISA MAJHI – Respondent
Page 1 of 6
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
OJC No.16866 of 1997
Dandapani Dandasena and
another
….
Petitioners
Mr. B. Panigrahi, Advocate
-versus-
Tutisa Majhi and others
….
Opp. Parties
Mr. Dillip Kumar Mishra,
Additional Government Advocate
(For Opposite Party Nos. 3 and 4)
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA
Order No.
ORDER
11.08.2021
10.
1.
This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.
2.
As prayed for, Mr. Panigrahi, learned counsel is
permitted to place the matter on behalf of Mr. S. K. Padhi,
learned counsel for the Petitioners.
3.
Petitioners in this writ petition, seek to assail the order
dated 16th July, 1997 (Annexure-4) passed by the Additional
District Magistrate, Gajapati at Paralakhemundi-Opposite Party
No.3 in Regulation Appeal Case No.5 of 1995, whereby he
confirmed the order dated 30th May, 1995 (Annexure-3) passed
by Officer on Special Duty (LR), Paralakhemundi-Opposite
Party No.4 in RMC No.43 of 1993 directing restoration of the
land in question in favour of the petitioners therein together
with imposition of a penalty of Rs. 500/-
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.