SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DANDAPANI – Appellant
Versus
TUTISA MAJHI – Respondent


Advocates:
['M/S S K PADHI', '', 'S PARIDA', 'MISS D MOHAPATRA', '']

Page 1 of 6

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK

OJC No.16866 of 1997

Dandapani Dandasena and

another

….

Petitioners

Mr. B. Panigrahi, Advocate

-versus-

Tutisa Majhi and others

….

Opp. Parties

Mr. Dillip Kumar Mishra,

Additional Government Advocate

(For Opposite Party Nos. 3 and 4)

CORAM:

JUSTICE K.R.MOHAPATRA

Order No.

ORDER

11.08.2021

10.

1.

This matter is taken up by hybrid mode.

2.

As prayed for, Mr. Panigrahi, learned counsel is

permitted to place the matter on behalf of Mr. S. K. Padhi,

learned counsel for the Petitioners.

3.

Petitioners in this writ petition, seek to assail the order

dated 16th July, 1997 (Annexure-4) passed by the Additional

District Magistrate, Gajapati at Paralakhemundi-Opposite Party

No.3 in Regulation Appeal Case No.5 of 1995, whereby he

confirmed the order dated 30th May, 1995 (Annexure-3) passed

by Officer on Special Duty (LR), Paralakhemundi-Opposite

Party No.4 in RMC No.43 of 1993 directing restoration of the

land in question in favour of the petitioners therein together

with imposition of a penalty of Rs. 500/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top